Skip to content

Serious Consequences & Running in Fear?

January 9, 2009

Hmmm. Here is a simple 60 second ad that the networks refuse to run.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Why do they refuse to run it? Are they afraid of something? What is being asked for is very simple. So, why won’t Mr. Obama comply? If he has nothing to hide, as his campaigners have said, then why not simply produced the proof being asked for and shut everyone up?

Afraid to run an ad? What I am afraid of is having someone in the office of President who is not qualified. That could wreak total havoc on our country and our economy. iIf he is not qualified, then every decision he makes would be illegal. Everything he puts in place would be illegal. All agreements and treaties he works out with other countries would be illegal. We could have a nightmare on our hands. THAT is why we want proof, once and for all.

Mr. Obama is elected. As the future President of our great nation, he has my prayers and my support, even if I don’t agree with all of his policies. However, if he is NOT legally president, then I CANNOT support him. It would be flat out WRONG to do so!

You know…I read about people saying that there is no big deal here. However, if that is true, then why doesn’t Mr. Obama simply produce the certified complete copy of his original birth certificate as requested?

Janet Porter, who tried to run the ad, asks some very good questions in her blog? Questions like:

“What if an imposter from another country ran for the presidency and won?

What if the media blocked any news of his birthplace and citizenship?

What if the media censorship even blocked paid advertising that tried to expose it?

What if no one had the courage to challenge or verify it?

What if he was inaugurated illegally?

What if the military had to answer to a commander in chief who was illegitimate?

What if every law he signed was invalid?

What if every appointment he made was improper?

What if it all happened on our watch?”

Check out the rest of her blog post. She makes some good points. While you are at it, check out this article here, too.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. Ted permalink
    January 10, 2009 4:32 AM

    The nation owes more than thanks to three unlikely modern day patriots: professional poker player, musician, and retired attorney, Leo Donofrio; life long Democrat and former Pennsylvania assistant attorney general, Phil Berg; and Soviet emigree and attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz (she’s also a dentist).

    While Mr. Donofrio painstakingly established the airtight case that BHO could not be an Article II “natural born citizen” (at BHO’s birth, dad was British/Kenyan, not American, citizen) Leo’s Stay of the 12/15/08 electoral college vote was denied by SCOTUS as procedurally unripe.

    Nevertheless, since no congressman and senator objected on 1/8/09 to Congress’ count and certification of the electoral vote which would have turned resolution of Obama’s eligibility issue over to Congress — rendering moot the Berg and Taitz (Lightfoot) cases — Berg finally does achieve standing on the issue of actual harm, to be addressed at the Friday 1/9/09 SCOTUS Conference on Writ of Certiorari. Obama’s failure to submit evidence of his constitutional qualification for the 1/9/09 conference will mean he cannot thereafter challenge Berg’s request to enjoin the 1/8/09 Congressional electoral count and certification, albeit retroactive, scheduled for SCOTUS conference Friday 1/16/09. Moreover, Chief Justice Roberts has scheduled a full Court conference on the Lightfoot case Friday 1/23/09 in the event there needs to be a Constitutionally mandated action, the Inauguration itself, to enjoin retroactively.

    Now that BHO is in checkmate and cannot be POTUS, he can be a patriot as well. He need not subject the nation to the expense and trauma of requiring SCOTUS to overrule his ‘Presidency’. BHO can and should voluntarily step down with Biden becoming Acting POTUS under the 20th Amendment, and under the agreement all potential claims by the Government for itself and on behalf of others against BHO are released.

    • Abigail permalink
      January 10, 2009 9:36 AM

      Thank you for your comment, Ted. Some of us are not so familiar with the legalese, though. Do you think you could, perhaps, put things more in layman’s terms so that more people can get behind this?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: